A color photograph of the bombed-out historic city of nuremberg, germany in june of 1945, after the end of world war ii nuremberg had been the host of huge nazi party conventions from 1927 to 1938. The bombing of german cities during world war ii were not justified for many reasons, and none of them moral the claimed purpose of the allied bombings on germany may have been to demoralize the population and reduce production, but quite the opposite happened in the end. In light of what we now know of nazi germany's actions during the war, i would argue that most of those who fought against the regime would feel that the war was justified list cite link link.
Were the allied actions at the end of world war ii justified catholic answers timothy olyphant outs the one d-bag on justified - conan on tbs end of world war ii | the 20th. If you're asking were the allies justified in crushing hitler, and the united states justified in stopping japan's militaristic actions, then the answer would be yes i am sure had hitler and japan won, they would have cooked up justifications ad nauseam until we believed their reasons. During the later stages of world war ii and the post-war period, german citizens and people of german ancestry fled or were expelled from various eastern and central european countries and sent to the remaining territory of germany and austria.
Up until the allies declared war on germany in september of 1939 all of hitler's actions were heading eastward, towards russia the ribbentrop/molotov agreement was signed between russia and germany just weeks before hitler invaded poland. The good war mythology tends to cite three main reasons why the us involvement in the war meets the criterion of just cause: (1) the need to protect the us from a direct invasion by germany and/or japan (2) the moral imperative to stop the domination of the tyrannies of nazi germany and imperial japan in the cause of furthering. The nazis were justified in the aspect that they were soldiers who fought for what they considered right no front fighter knew of the experiments or the orchestrated mass-sacrifice of male germans for the sake of hitler's paranoia. World war ii justified by former german soldiers winner of the prestigious peace award at the film festival of the independent film in osnabrück germany, this documentary investigates the.
So, while germany's actions were clearly abhorrent, they were, i think, little different from what many countries at the time would have done under similar conditions actually, put it this way: donald trump stands a viable chance at getting elected , with an alarmingly fascist and nationalist platform, under circumstances far less extreme. France did not use military force to stop britain thought germany's actions were justified. Bombing centers of civilian population during world war ii should perhaps be considered in terms of offensive vs defensive military action germany and japan struck first in pursuing wars of. Wwii britain and france knew tht they were the only european countries strong to take on germany and knew they needed another year of preparation before they felt ready to take germany head on in total war, so to buy time they appeased it. Not sure if the request for my answer was meant to be offensive but if the actions of the nazis were justified, and if they had completed their goal of ridding europe of jews and other sub humans i wouldn't be here to offer my answer to this question i am guessing that you meant to.
Answer to put it simply: no japan waged a war of expansion at the expense of its neighbors, and they were the primary aggressor of war in the pacific germany mistakenly believed the war would. That's because the french were in war with germany, and had france been strong enough would have invaded germany with the uk remember, the french posed a threat to germany because france and russia were allied, and if russia invaded germany on the eastern front franace would invade on the western front. I myself believe stalin's fears were grounded in the past actions of the west against the soviet, and as such perhaps well founded in his mind, and with justificaiton.
With the exception of lithuania, germany declared that those areas and nations were outside germany's political interests there was a special provision in the case that england succeeded in inciting poland into war against germany. Honestly, nobody's entry into wwi was justified (yes, jus ad bellum varies wildly from person to person, but let's be real here) i mean, it was great in terms of population control and technological development, and i much, much prefer wwi imagery to that of wwii. Many feel that germany was just as ruthless and nationalistic in wwi as they were in wwii, but not all agree with this sentiment some actually believe that their cause was more justified than it is commonly believed to be. This question is vague the actions of the world war two battles were done by air, sea and land with all the modern types of warfare of its day.
Now, although the japanese were clearly the aggressors that drew us into wwii, i have met people who claim that wwii should have been fought as a purely defensive war, with the focus being on japan alone and allowing germany to duke it out with britain(even though japan and germany were freaking allies. Best answer: it was justified, at the time that is now it can be considered as a embarrassment on the us behalf by some because it hugely violated civil rights, the constitution, and we came to find out not many japanese interned were actually spies. If germany had won the war, european civilisation as we know it would have ended genocide, mass murder and slavery would have been institutionalised across the continent therefore, the allies were justified in carrying out almost any action that helped to prosecute the war successfully.